Qloo contributed
Cultural relationships, resolved identity and candidate-specific evidence.
No candidate-specific cultural evidence available for the displayed state evaluation.
Preference authority for autonomous agents
Qloo gives agents taste. TastePolicy gives that taste authority boundaries.
Proposal → cultural evidence → preference authorization → bounded next action
Agent proposal
A concierge may recommend a place or add it to a draft. It may not book or pay.
Your five explicitly reviewed preferences. No demographic assumptions.
Dinner / stay · recommendation only. No transaction requested.
No provider request has been made. Resolve, review, then evaluate explicitly.
No decision or provider ID is selected automatically.
Keep the same proposal. Change an explicit rule or supply missing context; do not change the cultural score.
ASK is not guaranteed by pressing a button: the accepted evaluator must find a genuine unresolved factor. REJECT repair requires a valid separately verified replacement.
Cultural relationships, resolved identity and candidate-specific evidence.
No candidate-specific cultural evidence available for the displayed state evaluation.
Whose state · context · explicit constraints · deterministic decision · continuation boundary · auditable receipt.
Qloo does not own the user's durable rules. A high affinity cannot override an explicit exclusion.
Experimental policy; not human-calibrated. No LLM decides the outcome.
No Qloo outage is claimed. This separate rehearsal neither changes a real result nor overrides a known hard block.
RECORDED LIVE ACCEPTANCE · 2026-10-13T15:41:38.396Z. HOUSE OF FINN JUHL HAKUBA / place: affinity 0.9233086745343598, ALLOW, complete explainability. Source: committed M1 live acceptance report. This observation is not a current receipt, provider response, or current authorization.
Inspect historical acceptance provenance